Why did Fuax news LIE about people the Lack of insurance linked to 45,000 deaths?
Written By: admin on March 29, 2010
20 Comments
Link of Researchers from Cambridge Health Alliance
http://www.boston.com/news/health/blog/2009/09/uninsured_hold.html?p1=Well_MostPop_Emailed7
Fuax new LIE LINK
http://www.casttv.com/video/bxxkbz/obama-s-tale-of-man-dying-because-insurance-was-cancelled-do-to-unreported-gallstones-is-fake-video
FUAX NEWS DOES NOT FACT CHECK
FACT ha ha h ah ah hahahahahaha
Related Mans Health Posts
Tags: 45000, about, blog, boston, cambridge health alliance, deaths, fact check, Fuax, gallstones, insurance, lack, linked, News, news health, people









It’s FAUX. FACT. lol
Obama killed my kitten.
I don’t know why they may have lied. Do you have a link showing that Fox claimed 45,000 deaths for lack of insurance?
I’m curious, if you don’t like Fox, why do you watch them?
Your sources are two op-ed blog sites? Whats next, RepublicansSucks.com?
By the way, your second link says Obama got it incorrect, not Fox News ; )
Well since you want to act like a idiot, i’ll just take my 2 points.
Fox is an entertainment network, not a news network, and has admitted as such in court. They use sensationalist hyperbole instead of facts and research because they were born without journalistic integrity.
Other networks are biased, most notably MSNBC to the left, but Fox is pure extremist propaganda and it’s time we treated it as such.
Why are you surprise they are excellent for that all they want to report on is ACORN like they got one stuck up their butt
Why are the dems lying about 47 million (or is now 30 million) without health care?
oh fantastic.so if it is such a emergency,why is it going to take until 2013 to implement it.get real,these are what they call acceptable.
Bo Obama raped my puppy!
A Catch 22 answer- lack of health insurance cannot lead to death. Lack of healthcare can.
So…. this begs the followup question- why are we so concerned about the health insurance industry when we should focus on the health care industry?
The study says after 12 years 351 people had died from a possible lack of insurance coverage . Not the 45000 you make it out to be . In addition anyone in this country can go to any hospital and receive treatment so why didnt they ? Whose fault is that the insurance companies or their own stupidity ?
Fox news scares people. It frightened me for a min yesterday but then i snapped back into reality because i know that the sky is not really falling.All the creepy music and suggestive pictures can get to you sometimes.
Keith Olbermann would you stop playing on Yahoo answers and start concentrating on correcting the lies you tell.
If any news broadcast has the look of a Saturday Night Live sketch, it is yours.
No wonder your ratings are so low.
Mike
Liberal links, citing liberal people who present no evidence yet make wild claims. Do you have anything to present that’s really objective?
Incorrect again! As a nurse I can tell you that I don’t look into your wallet before I care for you.
What a dumb statement,on this question that is rebuked by your own source.
FACT..hahahahahahahaha
MR
You are incorrect here, FOX was right. Your links have nothing to do with one another.
This is a excellent example of how Fox News distorts the facts in order to make a point. It is clear from the sister’s testimony that Raddatz’s treatment was delayed at a crucial time due to the cancellation of his health insurance policy.
Yeah, it really is a shame more people can’t afford health insurance. If only the stimulus had worked and unemployment wasn’t so high. Most of the six million people who lost their jobs after the stimulus was passed lost their health insurance too.
Of course that doesn’t stop Democratic Sen. Max Baucus of Montana from wanting to force people to buy it anyway (or face a huge fine). Curiously he gets a lot of donations from health care industries and insurance companies.
There is a lot of talk in Congress about scratching the public option too. The best estimates are that it might be 10% cheaper than a comparable policy from an insurance company (if it passes into law). That isn’t much, but I suppose it’s something. But it would also mean gutting Medicare funding. Weird how when it comes to Medicare the subject is how wasteful government run health care programs are, but when it comes to the health care reform bill and the hundreds of billions it would cost they’re talking about how much it would cut waste. Somehow spending somewhere between 800 billion and a trillion dollars to cut waste doesn’t seem like such an awesome deal.
I’m not sure what you were watching, but I imagine you must be one of those folks who forgot that we humans don’t get out of life alive. The question about health insurance isn’t if you can get help, but if you can get help in a timely manner, and enough of it to matter. Right now, most of us can. We’re not so sure that the situation won’t drastically change for the worse. Talk is cheap. The president is supposed to be from Illinois, but he knows nothing about farming, which is what nearly 2/3 of Illinois land is used for. He knows the huge city, but not everyone lives within six blocks of a doctor, a clinic, or a hospital–not even in Chicago. But I want to choose my doctor based on whether I reckon I can trust him, and reckon he’ll do his best to keep me alive so I’ll keep paying him. Mr Obama introduced a children’s health care act here and it passed. Now all the kids are entitled to health care, but those who provide it will just have to wait to get paid because it was never funded. He has changed his mind too many times to count on him not doing it again, and his presentations are wishful, not reality based.